Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatric Health Med Ther ; 15: 159-170, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38585425

RESUMO

Introduction: Despite being an excellent source of essential nutrients, whole cow's milk poses risks for young children. This is mainly due to its association with adverse effects, including growth inhibition, delayed brain and motor development, and increased morbidity and mortality. The current study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of untimely introduction of whole cow milk, stunting and related factors among children below the age of 5 years. Methods: A community-centered survey was implemented on 806 mother-child matches. Expressive statistics such as frequency, magnitude, mean and standard deviation were computed. Multivariable logistic regression was done to discover independent determinants of the dependent variables. A p-value of <0.05 was used to affirm significant association. Results: From the survey participant children 311 (39.2%) of them were stunted. About 453 (57.1%) of children were fed whole cow milk earlier than the age of one year. Mothers who are able to read and write were 49% less likely to initiate cow milk earlier than the age of one year with AOR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.33-0.78. Not attending the growth monitoring and promotion service is a risk for untimely introduction of whole cow milk (AOR = 3.47, 95% CI 2.43-4.94). Children who did not start consuming whole cow milk earlier than the age of one year were 54% less likely to be stunted than those who started consuming whole cow milk before the age of one year (AOR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.33-0.65). Conclusion: More than half of the study participant children started consuming whole cow milk before the age of one year. Children who did not start consuming whole cow milk early were less likely to be stunted.

2.
Pan Afr Med J ; 41: 314, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35865838

RESUMO

Introduction: catastrophe is a thoughtful community's well-being problem nowadays. Tragedies of any kind can strike at any time and have claimed many lives. Because, the emergency unit is at the frontline of disaster/emergency response system and helps as initial point to the most proper care of causalities, health professionals who are working in this area are the first caregivers, main players, and upfront role in calamity responses after pre-hospital medical services to disaster victims. The aim of this study was to assess emergency unit health professionals´ knowledge, attitude, practice, and related factors towards disasters and emergency preparedness at hospitals in the South Gondar Zone, Ethiopia, 2020. Methods: institution-based cross-sectional study with the census method was conducted at South Gondar Zone hospitals. All health professionals working in emergency units of South Gondar Zone hospitals were taken as a sample. A structured self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data. EPI-data version 4.2 and SPSS version 25 were used to enter and analyze data, respectively. The result was presented by narration, tables, and charts. Binary logistic regression was employed to determine the relations between dependent and independent variables. Results: the majority of the respondents (58.3%) were male. Regarding their profession, 52.2% were nurses, followed by physicians, 18.5%, while the rest were others. The mean age of the respondents was 29.48 ± 6.34 years. A substantial proportion (58.9%) of the study participants didn´t know whether their hospitals had a disaster management plan or not. In general, fifty-one-point seven percent´s (51.7%) of the study participants had poor knowledge toward disaster/emergency preparedness. Concerning their attitude, 55.0% had a negative attitude toward disaster preparedness. Regarding their levels of practice, 67.5% had inadequate practice disaster/emergency preparedness. Age category and profession of the respondents had a significant effect on the knowledge and attitude of respondents at P-value 0.05. Conclusion: more than half of the study participants had poor knowledge, negative attitudes, and inadequate practice about disaster/emergency preparedness.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Defesa Civil , Planejamento em Desastres , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Adulto , Defesa Civil/normas , Defesa Civil/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Planejamento em Desastres/normas , Planejamento em Desastres/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA